longform journalism

• The Price of Remission (2025/05)
• When the World Connected on Skype (2025/04)
• People are Losing Loved Ones to AI-Fueled Spiritual Fantasies (2025/05)
• Everyone Is Cheating Their Way through College: ChatGPT has unraveled the entire academic project. (2025/07)
• The Translator's Dilemma: Thinking vs Doing (2025/05)
• From the archives: How the Berenstain Bears Found Salvation (2016/10)
• Poetry: We Lived Happily During the War, by Ilya Kaminsky

A statement from an HBO spokesperson claimed that the [reboot] would benefit from Rowling’s involvement and that Rowling has the right to her beliefs.

While that may be true, the statement from HBO goes on to say: “We are proud to once again tell the story of ‘Harry Potter’ — the heartwarming books that speak to power, friendship, resolve and acceptance.” Note the last word in that sentence, and you’ll spot the dissonance between HBO’s statement and the reality of the situation. Rowling’s role in the show’s production is directly tied to its existence and vice versa, whether the network likes it or not. She’s even made time for posts about it amid the seemingly endless barrage of transphobic garbage.